Roozbeh Gillasian - Frame without boundary
In this paper I attempt to inquire what is listed in below:
1- In natural language we can not call the functional types of concept functional because they don't operate such as a function. They are more complicated.
2- Frames don't have demarcations but they demarcate. And how a frame without boundary can be a frame?
3- Frames can recourse but this doesn't mean that they accomplish a process and return to first place. This recourse can bea reversibility of a history on itself.
4- Isn't there a possibility that frames not have structural aspect? Then a frame without structure can demarcate?
5- It is possible that supposedly, with fixed variables, the function doesn't have any determination. And the progress in reality is it.
6- How can we suppose a linguistic or mental status identical whit a referent status in a set of attribute-value structures?
7- Every philosophy willy-nilly has a philosophy of morals too. But what is the ethical philosophy of this philosophy? Probably it is philosophy of computer's morals.
8- We can make any technical or methodological supposition to carry the
affair forward; but we are not allowed to treat negligently in thinking.