FFF CONFERENCE CTF07

Roozbeh Gillasian - Frame without boundary

In this paper I attempt to inquire what is listed in below:

1- In natural language we can not call the functional types of concept functional because they don't operate such as a function. They are more complicated.

2- Frames don't have demarcations but they demarcate. And how a frame without boundary can be a frame?

3- Frames can recourse but this doesn't mean that they accomplish a process and return to first place. This recourse can bea reversibility of a history on itself.

4- Isn't  there a possibility that frames not have structural aspect?  Then a frame without structure can demarcate?

5- It is possible that supposedly, with fixed variables, the function doesn't have any determination. And the progress in reality is it.

6- How can we suppose a linguistic or mental status identical whit a referent status in a set of attribute-value structures?

7- Every philosophy willy-nilly has a philosophy of morals too. But what is the ethical philosophy of this philosophy? Probably it is philosophy of computer's morals.

8- We can make any technical or methodological supposition to carry the
affair forward; but we are not allowed to treat negligently in thinking.